Hello again,
I have reviewed the sign convention information for the forward gravity operator in SimPEG. I have a few doubts I was hoping someone could solve.
-
If the sign convention for the forward operator differs, how are we supposed to use the inversion codes for actual data, where the positive density anomalies create gravity highs?
-
In Dr Astic’s 2021 paper, as well as the PGI tutorial (Joint PGI of Gravity + Magnetic on an Octree mesh using full petrophysical information — SimPEG 0.19.0 documentation), the gravity anomaly is a gravity low, and the inverted density model consists of a negative density contrast, which follows the general convention, but goes against the positive-Z up convention given as an explanation in this topic (Simulation: Gravity Anomaly Data on Tensor Mesh - #2 by thibaut.astic). How should one achieve the results in Dr Astic’s paper and the example in the above link (as a positive density contrast makes sense for the Kimberlite pipe anomaly, given the convention used in SimPEG)?
Please let me know; I appreciate any help that I can get.
Thanks and regards
Akshay